منابع مشابه
Arguments in English Josef
Despite the idiosyncratic properties of null-complement phenomena observed by Fillmore (1986), Lambrecht and Lemoine (2005), and others, many researchers have pursued large-scope, single-factor explanations of the distributional and interpretive restrictions on null complements—in particular, explanations based on Aktionsart (Rappaport Hovav and Levin 1998) and selectional restrictions (Resnik ...
متن کاملMissing arguments in earlier English clause structures
The purpose of this paper is to account for missing arguments in impersonal constructions in earlier English. Having examined all the proposals for accounting for the missing arguments in line with the discussion of such arguments in early child English, we saw that all of them had potential problems. I proposed a new view that the missing arguments were not missing, but simply did not exist in...
متن کاملArguments for F-Theory
After a brief review of string and M -Theory we point out some deficiencies. Partly to cure them, we present several arguments for “F -Theory”, enlarging spacetime to (2, 10) signature, following the original suggestion of C. Vafa. We introduce a suggestive Supersymmetric 27-plet of particles, associated to the exceptional symmetric hermitian space E6/Spin c(10). Several possible future directi...
متن کاملPriority Arguments in Complexity Theory
machine-independent) complexity theory is basically a theory which establishes limits on what may be said about the complexity of specific recursive functions. (For example, the speed-up theorem [1] shows that it is not always possible to discover close upper and lower bounds for the complexity of a function.) As such, its basic proof method is diagonalization. Sacks, Spector, etc. [2], [3] hav...
متن کاملPriority Arguments in Computability Theory, Model Theory, and Complexity Theory
These notes present various priority arguments in classical computability theory, effective model theory, and complexity theory in a uniform style. Our notation usually follows Soare (1986) with some exceptions. We view Turing functionals as c.e. sets Φ of triples ⟨x, y, σ⟩, denoting that Φ(σ;x) ↓= y. (Of course, we have to impose the obvious compatibility condition, namely, that if ⟨x, y, σ⟩, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Third Text
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0952-8822,1475-5297
DOI: 10.1080/09528822.2018.1558645